Let's talk

If I were a Chief Investment Officer, what would my focus be for 2026?

×
Video - Podcast
Translations from English are done by AI, without human oversight, and may not be accurate
Investment Investment strategy Corporate strategy
Joshua Tree

The turn of the year invites a flurry of articles containing predictions, forecasts and “things to look out for”. Yet seasoned investors know that forecasting is, at best, an entertaining parlour game and, at worst, a distraction from sensible long-term allocation decisions.

Still, it is impossible to ignore the background noise: record-high equity indices and narrow credit spreads are accompanied with ominous headlines about weak economies, asset bubbles and geopolitical fracture. Against that backdrop, here is how we would approach 2026 if we were wearing a Chief Investment Officer’s hat. 

Current market backdrop for investors

Expensive risk assets

Despite the occasional wobble, most developed-market equities finished 2025 at or near all-time highs. Price-to-earnings multiples have stretched, especially in the AI-themed growth stocks, making even modest earnings disappointments hazardous. 

Low credit spreads

Investment-grade and even high-yield bonds are trading at some of the tightest spreads since 2007. Investors have chased yield in private credit too, fuelling fears of covenant-lite financing and overexuberant lending practices.

Persistent macro headwinds

Sluggish real world growth, rolling energy shocks and an unpredictable geopolitical landscape, with its accompanying volatility in sovereign bonds and currencies, leave little margin for error. The phrase “highest level since 2009” appears with disquieting frequency.

Fear of bubbles

From AI equities that price perfection, to private credit funds promising equity-like returns with bond-like risk, investors are reliving uncomfortable echoes of both the dotcom era and the pre-Global Financial Crisis “search for yield”.

Evil demon thought experiment 

Against this backdrop some of my colleagues and us have conducted a thought experiment. And like all the best thought experiments it involves an evil demon. Imagine an evil demon had slipped into your systems on 31 December 2025 and liquidated every position in your portfolio, leaving you with nothing but the equivalent amount of cash for the next morning. You awake on 1 January 2026 to a blank slate.

Faced with the prospect of rebuilding, would you really go out and repurchase the same assets you previously held at today’s prices?

The point of this is to strip away the anchoring bias that can often influence investors. When the default is not to own anything, the hurdle rate for buying back feels drastically higher.

In our case, it forces an uncomfortable admission: a significant chunk of public-risk assets currently looks rich, and the risk-reward trade off in many private markets feels overheated. That does not mean everything should be sold or that Armageddon is inevitable, but it does argue for a defensive tilt until valuations or fundamentals improve.

CIO priorities for 2026

With that in mind, what would we be thinking about as a CIO in 2026? Here are our priorities:

Protecting the core: tail-risk hedges 

While insurance always feels expensive before the accident, now is not the time to let cover lapse. Consider how your portfolio would stand up to significant equity market draw-downs, a liquidity squeeze and swinging yields. Diversification is always desirable, but putting more specific hedges in place may also be worth the cost, whether that be derivative structures or alternative tail-risk hedging structures.

Shortening duration 

Clearly selling everything is uncomfortable, and whilst credit spreads are low they are not nothing. However, the compensation for locking your money away for ten years, doesn’t compensate you for the risk. Moving into credit with lower maturities still gives you some extra yield, but comes with added flexibility if markets re-price. Be wary chasing yield in late-cycle markets. We wouldn’t be searching for extra return in sub-investment grade debt right now.

Prioritise liquidity: keep your powder dry 

Cash yields may be falling, and holding too much of it erodes the value of your portfolio when compared to inflation, yet it carries immense optionality when volatility spikes. Flexing strategic allocations to high-quality short-dated government bonds upwards gives you some ready ammunition if risk assets cheapen. Paying down any debt against hedging positions may be a better use of proceeds from risk asset sales than anything else right now.

Closing thoughts 

The new year should be a time of optimism, but it is no place for complacency. Valuations that imply nothing can go wrong rarely age well.

By focusing on protection, prudent duration, liquidity and opportunistic flexibility, a Chief Investment Officer can enter 2026 prepared for both adversity and the bargains that adversity eventually brings.

As you begin a fresh year, may your portfolios flourish - and may mischievous demons stay firmly outside the firewall this year.

If you would like to discuss any of these focus areas in more depth, please get in touch

Let's talk

Subscribe to our thinking

Get relevant insights, leading perspectives and event invitations delivered right to your inbox.
Get started to select your preferences.

Subscribe

Your questions answered

A collection of securities (eg UK equities) or asset classes (eg global equities, UK bonds, and UK property).

The decision as to the proportions of a portfolio to invest in different asset classes, for example 60% equities, 30% bonds, 10% property. Research indicates that the investment strategy decision typically accounts for the majority of returns rather than the choice of which manager to appoint to manage each asset class. Investment strategy normally refers to longer term (eg three years plus) asset allocation decisions.

This is the extra yield demanded by investors for investing in a corporate bond and is calculated as the difference between the (higher) yield on the corporate bond and the yield on a comparable government bond (with the same maturity and coupon). The spread is to compensate investors for the higher default risk of a company and perhaps also the lower liquidity of the corporate bond.

This is a measure of how quickly an asset can be sold for cash without causing a significant change in its price. Equities which are traded often, such as those of Vodafone, are very liquid while equities in very small companies are much less liquid.